Featured talk

From Prototype to Production

How to Build AI Systems People Can Trust

Abstract diagram of an AI workflow moving from prototype to production

Abstract

Most AI prototypes are easy to demo and hard to deploy. This talk covers the practical gap between prototype and production: workflow design, evaluations, trust, latency, cost, security, human-in-the-loop review, and adoption.

Key takeaways

What you'll walk away with.

01

Why most AI prototypes fail

02

Workflow-first AI design

03

Evaluation frameworks

04

Trust and safety

05

Human-in-the-loop systems

06

Production observability

07

Scaling AI products

The deck

Embedded slides.

Open slide
01 / 12

Inside the talk

The ideas, in depth.

01

Why most AI prototypes fail

A demo optimizes for the happy path; a product survives the long tail. Most prototypes break not on dramatic hallucinations but on small workflow recovery failures — a user replies 'good' instead of confirming, changes information mid-flow, or asks a side question. The gap between impressive and dependable is where real work begins.

02

Workflow-first AI design

Production AI is a workflow layer, not a single assistant. One interface quietly supports many kinds of work — questions, onboarding, transactions, analysis, escalation. Routing becomes the first product decision: before answering, the system must know what kind of work it's doing, then match the path, model, and cost to the task.

03

Evaluation frameworks

Evals are the regression system for AI products. Did routing improve? Did retrieval ground the answer? Did latency get worse? Did the workflow complete? Evals turn subjective 'it feels better' into a release gate, so every change is measured against the failures you've already seen.

04

Trust and safety

In high-stakes domains, a confidently wrong answer is the most expensive failure. Confidence thresholds, grounded context, and explicit abstention let the system decline rather than guess. Caching becomes policy: fast when safe, careful when stakes are high, never stale where it matters.

05

Human-in-the-loop systems

Human judgment compounds only when the loop closes. An expert correction that lives in Slack repeats the same mistake tomorrow; a correction that becomes context, a workflow rule, or an eval case makes the system better. The art is knowing when to involve a human — and how to capture what they teach.

06

Production observability

You can't improve what you can't trace. Observability is the full path of every request: which route was taken, what context was used, what the model saw, whether the cache hit, where the workflow was, whether a human reviewed, and whether the eval passed. The trace is the audit trail that makes the system trustworthy.

07

Scaling AI products

Scale is an accountability shift. The question is no longer whether the system can produce one good answer, but whether it can route correctly, preserve state, assemble the right context, cache safely, involve humans when needed, detect regressions, and improve after failure. The model answers; the system improves.

Interested in discussing these ideas?

I'm always up for conversations with founders, operators, and builders thinking about AI, products, and what comes next.